In recent years, the electric bike and electric scooter market has shown a clear trend: NCM (Nickel–Cobalt–Manganese) lithium batteries are used far more widely than Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries.
This does not mean LFP is inferior. Instead, the shift is mainly due to market demand, product design limitations, and performance requirements in light electric vehicles.
This article explains the key reasons behind this trend.
For e-bikes, scooters, and other light mobility devices, users care most about:
Longer riding range
Smaller battery size
Lighter weight
This is where NCM batteries have a major advantage:
➡ NCM batteries store more energy in the same volume.
Example:
| Battery Type | Typical Capacity in Same Size | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| LFP | 10–14Ah | Shorter range |
| NCM | 13–20Ah | Much longer range |
In popular cases such as Hailong batteries:
NCM can reach 48V 17.5Ah
LFP may only reach 48V 10–12Ah
So for manufacturers aiming for higher range, NCM becomes the natural choice.
Years ago, LFP was the cheaper option.
But from 2021–2024, major changes happened:
Massive production of 18650/21700 NCM cells
Mature supply chains
Increased competition among top cell factories
This led to significant cost reductions in NCM batteries.
As a result:
➡ NCM now offers higher performance with only slightly higher—or even similar—costs.
For most customers, the performance-to-price ratio is more attractive.
Most common e-bike battery cases were originally designed for NCM cell structures. Examples:
Hailong (Shark) cases
Rear rack batteries
Tube-integrated frame batteries
Triangle frame batteries
Since LFP cells are:
Larger
Lower in energy density
Heavier
They cannot provide sufficient capacity within the same shell size.
Example:
A Hailong shell can fit 17.5Ah NCM, but only around 10–12Ah LFP.
This capacity gap directly affects riding range, making LFP less attractive for light EV manufacturers.
Global e-bike and scooter buyers—especially in Europe and North America—expect:
Long riding range
Lightweight vehicles
Compact battery size
Higher speed and stronger performance
NCM fits these requirements almost perfectly.
Meanwhile, LFP, although safer and longer-lasting, is comparatively:
Heavier
Bulkier
Lower in energy density
Therefore, it struggles to compete in light mobility applications.
LFP remains a leading technology in areas like:
Energy storage systems
Home backup power
UPS power supplies
Low-speed vehicles
Shared e-bike fleets (high safety & long cycle life required)
These fields prioritize safety and cycle life over weight and energy density.
But for electric bikes and scooters, priorities are different—space and performance matter more.
| Factor | NCM | LFP |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Density | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Weight | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Volume Efficiency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Cycle Life | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Safety | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Cost Trend | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Why is NCM used more?
Because for e-bikes and scooters, NCM delivers what the market demands:
➡ longer range, lighter weight, smaller size, and stronger performance.
In recent years, the electric bike and electric scooter market has shown a clear trend: NCM (Nickel–Cobalt–Manganese) lithium batteries are used far more widely than Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries.
This does not mean LFP is inferior. Instead, the shift is mainly due to market demand, product design limitations, and performance requirements in light electric vehicles.
This article explains the key reasons behind this trend.
For e-bikes, scooters, and other light mobility devices, users care most about:
Longer riding range
Smaller battery size
Lighter weight
This is where NCM batteries have a major advantage:
➡ NCM batteries store more energy in the same volume.
Example:
| Battery Type | Typical Capacity in Same Size | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| LFP | 10–14Ah | Shorter range |
| NCM | 13–20Ah | Much longer range |
In popular cases such as Hailong batteries:
NCM can reach 48V 17.5Ah
LFP may only reach 48V 10–12Ah
So for manufacturers aiming for higher range, NCM becomes the natural choice.
Years ago, LFP was the cheaper option.
But from 2021–2024, major changes happened:
Massive production of 18650/21700 NCM cells
Mature supply chains
Increased competition among top cell factories
This led to significant cost reductions in NCM batteries.
As a result:
➡ NCM now offers higher performance with only slightly higher—or even similar—costs.
For most customers, the performance-to-price ratio is more attractive.
Most common e-bike battery cases were originally designed for NCM cell structures. Examples:
Hailong (Shark) cases
Rear rack batteries
Tube-integrated frame batteries
Triangle frame batteries
Since LFP cells are:
Larger
Lower in energy density
Heavier
They cannot provide sufficient capacity within the same shell size.
Example:
A Hailong shell can fit 17.5Ah NCM, but only around 10–12Ah LFP.
This capacity gap directly affects riding range, making LFP less attractive for light EV manufacturers.
Global e-bike and scooter buyers—especially in Europe and North America—expect:
Long riding range
Lightweight vehicles
Compact battery size
Higher speed and stronger performance
NCM fits these requirements almost perfectly.
Meanwhile, LFP, although safer and longer-lasting, is comparatively:
Heavier
Bulkier
Lower in energy density
Therefore, it struggles to compete in light mobility applications.
LFP remains a leading technology in areas like:
Energy storage systems
Home backup power
UPS power supplies
Low-speed vehicles
Shared e-bike fleets (high safety & long cycle life required)
These fields prioritize safety and cycle life over weight and energy density.
But for electric bikes and scooters, priorities are different—space and performance matter more.
| Factor | NCM | LFP |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Density | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Weight | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Volume Efficiency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Cycle Life | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Safety | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Cost Trend | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Why is NCM used more?
Because for e-bikes and scooters, NCM delivers what the market demands:
➡ longer range, lighter weight, smaller size, and stronger performance.